A choice between overheating and lung damage doesn’t appeal much, giving would-be climate controllers a new conundrum for their models to grapple with. Another excuse to wheel out catastrophe fears again.
– – –
Air pollution, a global scourge that kills millions of people a year, is shielding us from the full force of the sun, says Euractiv.
Getting rid of it will accelerate climate change. That’s the unpalatable conclusion reached by scientists poring over the results of China’s decade-long and highly effective “war on pollution”, according to six leading climate experts.
The drive to banish pollution, caused mainly by sulphur dioxide (SO2) spewed from coal plants, has cut SO2 emissions by close to 90% and saved hundreds of thousands of lives, Chinese official data and health studies show.
Yet stripped of its toxic shield, which scatters and reflects solar radiation, China’s average temperatures have gone up by 0.7 degrees Celsius since 2014, triggering fiercer heatwaves, according to a Reuters review of meteorological data and the scientists interviewed.
“It’s this Catch-22,” said Patricia Quinn, an atmospheric chemist at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), speaking about cleaning up sulphur pollution globally. “We want to clean up our air for air quality purposes but, by doing that, we’re increasing warming.”
The removal of the air pollution – a term scientists call “unmasking” – may have had a greater effect on temperatures in some industrial Chinese cities over the last decade than the warming from greenhouse gases themselves, the scientists said. [Talkshop comment – no mention of urban heat island effects].
Other highly polluted parts of the world, such as India and the Middle East, would see similar jumps in warming if they follow China’s lead in cleaning the skies of sulphur dioxide and the polluting aerosols it forms, the experts warned.
They said efforts to improve air quality could actually push the world into catastrophic warming scenarios and irreversible impacts.
Full article here.
– – –
From a Phys.org preview of the new Hansen et al climate paper:
Aerosols
The authors also conclude that much of the expected greenhouse gas warming in the past century has been offset by the cooling effect of human-made aerosols—fine airborne particles. Aerosols have declined in amount since 2010 as a result of reduced air pollution in China and global restrictions on aerosol emissions from ships. This aerosol reduction is good for human health, as particulate air pollution kills several million people per year and adversely affects the health of many more people.
However, aerosol reduction is now beginning to unmask greenhouse gas warming that had been hidden by aerosol cooling. The authors have long termed the aerosol cooling a “Faustian bargain” because, as humanity eventually reduces air pollution, payment in the form of increased warming comes due.
This new paper predicts that a post-2010 acceleration of global warming will soon be apparent above the level of natural climate variability. The 1970-2010 global warming rate of 0.18°C per decade is predicted to increase to at least 0.27°C per decade during the few decades after 2010. As a result, the 1.5°C global warming level will be passed this decade and the 2°C level will be passed within the following two decades.
– – –







aerosol reduction is now beginning to unmask greenhouse gas warming that had been hidden by aerosol cooling.
Or, clearer skies allow more sunlight to reach the surface.
It does appear that our esteemed climate scientists are inventing more and more causes of global warming, and yet the only course of action is to pin the blame on CO2 with all the catastrophic implications of net zero. Its a bit like betting on a horse race with 20 runners and placing everything on the one horse with three legs.
So global warming has been hidden by pollution but global warming has been happening? Pollution means lower levels of radiation reach the surface but they haven’t been able to measure lower levels of radiation?
Phoenix – yes, they have the answer so the questions are irrelevant 🙄
In other words “It’s even worse than we thought”.
I have the feeling I’ve heard this before, somewhere…
Shades of Schneider S. & Rasool S., “Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols – Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate”, Science, vol.173, 9 July 1971, p.138-141
Another plot twist perhaps…
In a surprising finding, light can make water evaporate without heat
A newly identified process could explain a variety of natural phenomena and enable new approaches to desalination.
MIT News
Publication Date: October 31, 2023
The phenomenon might play a role in the formation and evolution of fog and clouds, and thus would be important to incorporate into climate models to improve their accuracy, the researchers say.
. . .
Then, the team came across the work of another group that had achieved an evaporation rate double the thermal limit — which is the highest possible amount of evaporation that can take place for a given input of heat, based on basic physical principles such as the conservation of energy.
. . .
They began to suspect that the excess evaporation was being caused by the light itself —that photons of light were actually knocking bundles of water molecules loose from the water’s surface. This effect would only take place right at the boundary layer between water and air, at the surface of the hydrogel material — and perhaps also on the sea surface or the surfaces of droplets in clouds or fog.
https://news.mit.edu/2023/surprising-finding-light-makes-water-evaporate-without-heat-1031
Obviously these climate so called ‘scientists’ missed out on taking the logic course at university.
If the lack of pollution lets in more sunlight it will also let out more heat since space is rather cold. This is more like a cry from them for more money because the Bidenomics are making it hard to live in the custom they are used to.
Closing down the Scunthorpe Steelworks to clear the air ? Seems like there is at least one “Engineer” who is so happy about it: -comments :- https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/jobs-at-risk-as-british-steel-considers-electric-arc-furnaces .
How long before climate obsessives try to shut down meat sales?
— https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/11/02/scientists-declare-meat-should-have-cigarette-style-warning-labels-proposed-label-warning-eating-meat-contributes-to-climate-change/
Ehh? C’mon maan, who’s side are you on? Don’t be giving the ideas!
But / AND as I’ve said before, we should be investigating how to starve the likes of them off Vegetables then too, etc.
Efforts to reduce pollution are warming Earth FASTER, study claims
Updated 7 November 2023
Hansen said Earth’s energy imbalance is much higher than a decade ago.
‘That imbalance has now doubled. That’s why global warming will accelerate. That’s why global melting will accelerate,’ he said.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12717405/reduce-pollution-suflur-emissions-global-warming.html
. . .
Scientist Who Predicted NYC Would Be Underwater Says He’s ‘Not An Alarmist’
April 12, 2016
“I don’t think that I have been alarmist — maybe alarming, but I don’t think I’m an alarmist,” James Hansen, who used to head up NASA’s climate arm, told Yale Environment 360 in an interview.
https://dailycaller.com/2016/04/12/scientist-who-predicted-ny-city-would-be-underwater-says-hes-not-an-alarmist/
Doing a fair imitation of one in that case.
Is that so? Next door’s wee bairnie waking up to environmental issues at school and learning to read “big things” was trying to tell me about global warming and …. wait for it,,,……. Something on the news mr Biden was there, It said : Heat pumps to COOL your house due to global warming. Laughter on my part … but its TRUE:https://theconversation.com/heat-pumps-will-cool-your-home-during-the-hottest-of-summers-and-reduce-your-global-warming-impact-212515 but where do the plonkers think the removed heat GOES to? UHI ( not the daft one (the rejuvenated Tech,) in Inverness ) of course … and that doesn’t heat the planet (of course).
And from the Ragrat on the bbc “Unit for unit, electricity typically costs three times as much as gas. That means even though your new heat pump is three times as efficient as your gas boiler it costs about the same to run.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66359093 .
That’s all I need on another dull dreich wind LESS day … but gridwatch tells me otherwise.
UK Gridwatch says coal (4.1%) is producing nearly twice as much electricity as solar (2.1%) at the moment.
Dammit, Oldbrew, I missed that – those letterbox widescreens – failed to SHOW the whole picture. No Many do, but I don’t ( I hope) have tunnel vision! Hooray for Coal. …. I hope it’s not just burning off the puckle gathered in tidying up the many coalyards around the country.