Economic conundrums for Germany as top court cancels climate funding plan

Posted: November 24, 2023 by oldbrew in climate, government, Legal, Politics, Subsidies
Tags:


When might it occur to politicians, German or not, that endless subsidies to feed their own climate obsessions either come out of the same pot as the rest of their government’s income, or by pumping up national debt – or both? Looks like a road to nowhere, or nowhere good.
– – –
As Germany scrambles to find €60 billion after the constitutional court ruled that transferring unused COVID-related debt to a climate fund was against the constitution, economists warned that spending cuts could cost the country economic growth in the coming years following a parliamentary hearing on Tuesday, says Euractiv.

Last week, Germany’s Constitutional Court ruled that transferring €60 billion of unused COVID-related debt to a climate fund was against the constitution.

With the amount removed from the fund, the government is now discussing how to close the funding gap, with Finance Minister Christian Lindner (FDP/Renew Europe) calling for spending cuts.

But, at a parliamentary hearing on Tuesday, economists warned that cutting back on planned investments could prevent Germany from recovering from its current economic recession.

“We are stuck in stagnation, and we are facing a multiple, supply-side challenge for our economy,” said Michael Hüther, director of the German Economic Institute (IW), which is linked to German employers’ organisations.

The challenges of the green transition, infrastructure deficits and an ageing society “mean that we actually have a great need for investment here,” he added.

“If this doesn’t happen, and we see this in the description of historical investment crises, then they tend to feed on themselves over a longer period of time,” Hüther said, adding, “this means that we can probably no longer expect GDP growth next year”.

So far, economic forecasts by the EU Commission have predicted a contraction of the German economy by 0.3% in 2023 and a growth of 0.8% for next year.

His view was echoed by Jens Südekum, an economist at the University of Düsseldorf, who urged the government to resolve the issue quickly but without cutting back on investment, which could also put Germany at a competitive disadvantage internationally.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. saighdear says:

    Well it looks like their Lederhosen and Dirndls will be in more than a fankel – imagine that ? Higher premiums for eco-schemes decided
    The corresponding regulation passed the state chamber in the version presented. Funding is increasing significantly, especially for agroforestry. and so on it goes, see more at https://www.agrarzeitung.de/nachrichten/politik/bundesrat-hoehere-praemien-fuer-oeko-regelungen-beschlossen-109905
    Menschens KInder, du, I hear them say …. Stupid is what stupid does ( voting) is what I say.

  2. ivan says:

    The simple answer, which they will never use, is to scrap all the green programs and stupidity because nothing they can do is going to change the climate. No amount of spending of the public’s money or trying to force people to follow the UN Church of Climatology diktats does anything with the world’s climate so they would be better off ignoring the EU and all things green.

  3. Phoenix44 says:

    “Economists”? If the private sector won’t invest then its not investment.

  4. oldbrew says:

    So ‘GDP growth’ in climate-dominated thinking now depends on government spending money it doesn’t have? Interesting 🤔

  5. oldbrew says:

    It’s catching…

    Labour unlikely to meet its £28bn green pledge at all
    Sat, November 25, 2023

    A senior source in the Labour leader’s office said that was because of the state of the public finances. They stressed that Labour’s fiscal rules were more important than any policy.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-67528894
    – – –
    Saving the world is just too expensive these days.

  6. saighdear says:

    Och I’m no even going to read that report: Burying my head in the sand ? Noooh! I am too busy TURNING the soil. The Links on this website need a lot of plowing through https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/the-end-of-a-german-illusion/

  7. oldbrew says:

    the constitutional court ruled that transferring unused COVID-related debt to a climate fund was against the constitution

    Was that the plan all along – over-budget COVID then claim the excess for climate? If so they got found out.

  8. rod says:

    by and large: politicians ain’t climatologist, ain’t economists, ain’t engineers.
    What they are is experts at spending other peoples money—even if they have to borrow it. One wonders what their average IQ is?

Leave a comment