At least one expert was ‘not convinced’ by the study’s results. The theory that the ozone hole’s seasonal size was/is strongly related to human activity is left looking a bit threadbare, even if the study doesn’t exactly say that. But if the alleged cause has been mostly removed and the hole persists, to a significant extent at least, what other conclusion is there? ‘Rare events’ is one suggestion.
– – –
The hole in the Antarctic ozone layer has been getting deeper in mid-spring over the last two decades, despite a global ban on chemicals that deplete Earth’s shield from deadly solar radiation, new research suggested Tuesday.
The ozone layer 11 to 40 kilometers (seven to 25 miles) above Earth’s surface filters out most of the sun’s ultraviolet radiation, which can cause skin cancer and cataracts, says Phys.org..
From the mid-1970s, chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)—once widely used in aerosols and refrigerators—were found to be reducing ozone levels, creating annual holes largely over the Antarctica region.
The 1987 Montreal Protocol, which banned CFCs in a bid to close the hole, is considered a success story for international environmental cooperation.
In January, a major UN-backed assessment found that the agreement was working. It projected the ozone layer should be restored to 1980 levels over the Antarctic by around 2066.
Smaller holes over the Arctic were projected to recover by 2045, and for the rest of the world in around two decades.
But despite the decline in CFCs, there has not yet been a significant reduction in the area covered by the Antarctic ozone hole, according to New Zealand researchers behind a new study in the journal Nature Communications.
And there has been less ozone at the center of the hole over time, they added.
. . .
Martin Jucker, an expert at Australia’s University of New South Wales, was not convinced by the study’s results.
“It is questionable how the authors can remove 2002 and 2019 from the record but not 2020-22, given that all of these years have been shown to be dominated by very special and rare events,” he said.
Full article here.







If this is true the big question is – ‘who made money from the banning of CFCs?’ I note that my old frig (early 70s) is still going strong and keeps the contents better than the new one I got last month.
It is also obvious that anything to do with the earth that comes from the UN is suspect – they appear to be following the WEF population agenda about over population and ignoring the fact that as CO2 rises so does food production.
Air Conditioning coolant R12 and whatever else, were out of their patent period and anyone could make and sell it for very competitive prices. It was banned so it could be replaces with much more expensive patented products. That has been done since, the new patented products have been banned or restricted and replaced. The Ozone Hole is a naturally cycling event that they can lie about and it is hard to prove right or wrong, just like CO2 causing climate change is hard to prove right or wrong.
It is all power and money, nothing to do with actual science, all they need is some paid experts and media.
Yes, the need for new and expensive patents is what’s behind the false claim that human-emitted CFCs destroy the Ozone Hole. I just posted a graph on X.com showing the evolution of the Zone Hole according to NASA data, which falsify the claim:
https://x.com/NikolovScience/status/1728915705146540350?s=20
The data from recent years (e.g. last 20) on NASA’s ozone website don’t impress much. Apart from an anomaly in 2019 the ozone hole area figures are very similar to the 1990s.
https://www.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/ozone-layer/2023-ozone-hole-ranks-16th-largest/
Wikipedia says the old CFCs hang around for a long time in the atmosphere, with a manhattan graphic that seems to show HCFC’s *increasing* since the agreement to ban them (see 1990 indicator).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorofluorocarbon#Impact_as_greenhouse_gases
There is or was also a fair amount of smuggling and recycling of old CFCs going on, ‘as recognized by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) in a 2006 report titled “Illegal Trade in Ozone Depleting Substances”.’
My understanding is CFCs are relatively persistent and the ban stopped new production, not any further release. Thus there would be a continued increase followed by a slow decline. Which is what we see. As for conspiracy theories about patents….please.
The headline of the Phys.org article is ‘Antarctic ozone hole getting deeper in mid-spring, research suggests’. Hard to see how that can be attributed to humans, without resorting to arcane thought processes anyway?
” deeper in mid-spring” .. uhuh, I know exactly WHEN that was , don’t we? It’s 3.49 here
1)The antartic is the Earth´s ice cube making machine, the same as in our fridges.
2)The Water Cycle is not close but open. It is a cyclical event, When the OZONE hole grows it is because Ozone has reacted with Solar protons to produce water (ICE CUBES!)
3)Ice overflows the antartica Andes westwards. It is not melting down.
I’ve referred to the following article published in 1993. It is worth reviewing I believe.
Click to access Sheridan-CFC-SEMA-Oct-1993.pdf
Item number 3 is of particular significance. I’ve also read that the atomic weight of R12 (and probably R134) is much greater than all the basic gases in our atmosphere, suggesting that when not influenced by strong winds it will settle to the ground where astonishingly, it is broken down in plants to aid in chlorophyll production
What we do know is that the Earth’s ozone “hole” is directly over the south magnetic pole, and that this side of the Earth is the leading “face” as it moves through space with the Sun. I think it would very instructive to examine the atmospheres of all solar system orbs with a southern polarity in similar alignment. My suspicion is that what we are observing in our atmosphere is an artifact of a magnetic field moving through the charged particle stream of space (mainly in concert with its precessional orbit), having very little to do with what atomic elements are found at the surface of the planet, whether natural or man-made. I also suspect that such investigation by space probes has been suppressed/ignored for obvious reasons.
I also think it would be revealing to correlate celestial events with the Protocol enactment in 1989. What changed during the late 80s in the solar system that might have had some influence on the Earth’s magnetic pole and the increase in the ozone “hole?”
Telling little green lies? (H/T jb)
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1995
The hole in the ozone layer has more to do with politics than deodorants, a French scientist tells Ian Phillips.
If there is one thing Haroun Tazieff believes in, it is speaking his mind. “When I’ve got something to say, I say it,” he asserts.
. . .
…in recent years he has found a new hobby-horse – the ecological lies he believes Green politicians have invented to scare the electorate into voting for them.
One of his favourites is the disintegration of the ozone layer by the infamous CFC gases. “It’s a complete lie,” he told me vehemently, when we met in Paris recently. “The ozone hole is a natural hole which appears above the Antarctic at the beginning of October and has disappeared by the end of December. In Europe, I think I’m the only person to refute it, and I have never been officially contradicted, neither by ecologists nor by scientists.”
. . .
Even if CFCs do have an effect, he asserts that it must be an insignificant one. After all, it is alleged that it is the chlorine in the CFCs which breaks down the ozone molecules. However, only 7,500 tons of chlorine are released from the breakdown of CFCs every year, against 600 million tons from the evaporation of seawater and 36 million from volcanoes.
What is more, the effect of chlorine is to break down the ozone into oxygen plus by-products, and it simply requires the presence of ultraviolet rays to transform the oxygen back into ozone.
https://uwaterloo.ca/wat-on-earth/news/telling-little-green-lies
little green lies, eh Try that in your local County Court.A lot of people have been upset by all this green nonsense
There is no research showing that CFCs have any impact on atmospheric ozone….
All they had was ‘a growing concern’…

https://www.britannica.com/science/chlorofluorocarbon
But as Tazieff pointed out, ‘only 7,500 tons of chlorine are released from the breakdown of CFCs every year, against 600 million tons from the evaporation of seawater and 36 million from volcanoes.’
Well, maybe just little yellow-green Lies, then? or if youprefer others set yourself on fire here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrotechnic_colorant
Great comments, JB. I agree with you…