This was found to have been going on ‘during past warm periods’ (what caused those?), so we may wonder what difference a bit more now is likely to make. It’s admitted that scientists need to ‘understand better the role of hydrates in the climate system’ – or if they have one worth getting agitated about?
– – –
An international team of researchers led by Newcastle University found that as frozen methane and ice melts, methane – a potent greenhouse gas – is released and moves from the deepest parts of the continental slope to the edge of the underwater shelf, says EurekAlert.
They even discovered a pocket which had moved 25 miles (40 kilometres).
Publishing in the journal Nature Geoscience, the researchers say this means that much more methane could potentially be vulnerable and released into the atmosphere as a result of climate warming.
Methane hydrate
Methane hydrate, also known as fire-ice, is an ice-like structure found buried in the ocean floor that contains methane. Vast amounts of methane are stored as marine methane under oceans.
It thaws when the oceans warm, releasing methane into oceans and the atmosphere – known as dissociated methane – contributing to global warming. [Talkshop comment – vague assertion].
The scientists used advanced three-dimensional seismic imaging techniques to examine the portion of the hydrate that dissociated during climatic warming off the coast of Mauritania in Northwest Africa. They identified a specific case where dissociated methane migrated over 40 kilometres and was released through a field of underwater depressions, known as pockmarks, during past warm periods.
Lead author, Professor Richard Davies, Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Global and Sustainability, Newcastle University, said: “It was a Covid lockdown discovery, I revisited imaging of strata just under the modern seafloor offshore of Mauritania and pretty much stumbled over 23 pockmarks.
Our work shows they formed because methane released from hydrate, from the deepest parts of the continental slope vented into the ocean. Scientists had previously thought this hydrate was not vulnerable to climatic warming, but we have shown that some of it is.”
Researchers have previously studied how changes in bottom water temperature near continental margins can affect the release of methane from hydrates. However, these studies mainly focused on areas where only a small portion of global methane hydrates are located.
This is one of only a small number that investigate the release of methane from the base of the hydrate stability zone, which is deeper underwater. The results show that methane released from the hydrate stability zone travelled a significant distance towards land.
Professor Dr Christian Berndt, Head of the Research Unit Marine Geodynamics, GEOMAR, in Kiel, Germany, added:
“This is an important discovery. So far, research efforts focused on the shallowest parts of the hydrate stability zone, because we thought that only this portion is sensitive to climate variations.
“The new data clearly show that far larger volumes of methane may be liberated from marine hydrates and we really have to get to the bottom of this to understand better the role of hydrates in the climate system.”
Full article here.







More yummy carbon for the marine bugs.
Link to study …
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-023-01333-w
. . .
Previously, only ~3.5% of hydrates in the exposed zone were considered a potential climate driver. However, some of the ~96.5% further down the slope can also contribute to methane venting in response to ocean warming, and this requires a reassessment of their role in climate change and potential incorporation in climate models.
– – –
Does the ‘reassessment’ idea suggest any other thinking than tired greenhouse gas alarm theories?
It appears the ‘researchers’ have found the magic formula to pay their way to plush air conditioned offices – the global warming scam.
Why is it that when climate scientists discover they don’t actually know about something, it’s always “worse than we thought”? If you’ve just discovered yiu are ignorant, maybe pause and reflect on that ignorance rather than immediately jump to conclusions?
We should quickly use the Methane in the Hydrates so that it is converted in to the less powerful GHG CO2.
Plus we get energy at the same time.
Problem solved.
Concerning methane hydrates, new technologies are being developed in Germany that may be useful for exploring and extracting the hydrates.
The basic idea is very simple: the methane (CH4) is harvested from the hydrates by replacing it with CO2. Laboratory studies show that this is possible in theory because liquid carbon dioxide reacts spontaneously with methane hydrate. If this concept could become economically viable, it would be a win-win situation, because the gas exchange in the hydrates would be attractive both from a financial and a climate perspective.”
http://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/energy/methane-hydrates/2/
warming shown to cause methane to be released from the deep ocean
So the cause is the warming and the effect is the release, not the other way round.
Ahh! But but but, I hear them say, its all that methinks from the cowfartz that caused the heating in the first place, or all that glowing bull emissions of CO2., eh?
Oilprice.com says:
‘Emerging markets as a whole currently account for 45% of global GDP. By 2040, this will rise to 53%, representing 70% of global GDP growth. And these markets are energy intensive, meaning energy demand will be rising over the next 17 years, at least, efficiency gains and all. With that, demand for hydrocarbons will be rising, too, whatever commitments current governments make at the COP28.’ [bold added]
– – –
Renewables don’t qualify as energy intensive.