Vast village heat pump tests one route to net zero for rural Britain

Posted: December 6, 2023 by oldbrew in Energy, innovation, net zero
Tags:


At £12 million per village, what would the national cost of such devices be for all the other villages that might want one? If it ‘shows how the costs of the energy transition can be made more manageable’, we could ask: more manageable than what?
– – –
In a quiet field in eastern England a vast heat pump generates enough warmth to supply houses throughout a historic village, a pilot project is testing ways to spur renewable energy use in a country that is falling behind its net zero targets, says Reuters.

Resembling a large agricultural site, with gleaming silver water vats, the heat pump produces water hot enough to feed existing domestic systems, removing the need for costly home retrofits. A 60-year funding scheme removed upfront costs.

Supporters say the network, the first of its kind in rural Britain, not only shows one way for the UK to catch up with Europe on heat pump adoption, but addresses how it can fund the wider net zero transition when household finances are tight.

“The truth is getting to net zero is going to cost money,” said Miles Messenger from Bouygues Energies & Services, which helped design and build the heat network in Swaffham Prior, near the university city of Cambridge.

“What this project brings in particular is a demonstration of how to do everything in one go for a village community.”

The government’s official climate advisers have said Britain is not doing enough to meet its net zero target.

If it is to hit the goal by 2050 it will need to decarbonise 28 million homes – a major challenge when 85% rely on piped natural gas for heating and hot water, and when that gas is significantly cheaper than the electricity used by heat pumps.
. . .
The 12 million pound ($15 million) cost was covered by a 3 million pound government grant and a loan secured by the local council which will be repaid via household bills over 60 years. To help the switch, bills are index-linked to be in line or less than the cost of heating oil and will in time be indexed to the price of electricity.

So far in a village of two churches, two windmills and around 300 houses, more than 60 are connected to the heat pump which uses both air and ground heat sources. More than 35 are ready to be added, and others are weighing whether to join.

Those behind the project say it will not work for all communities – rural or urban – but it shows how the costs of the energy transition can be made more manageable.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. ivan says:

    A couple of questions. How much is it going to cost people to connect to this la-la land idea? How well is it going to work when the snow comes? Heat pumps need some heat to pump, they might work if the temperature gets low but they cut off at about 4 degree C which is when the heat is needed.

  2. saighdear says:

    Och aye, what’s £12,000,000 ? buys a dozen combines – or 1 mile of dual carriageway, or ,,, but: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_villages_in_England So that’s some value for money for some then , eh? Oh, in other words, village means…… 97 per cent stuff again ?

  3. oldbrew says:

    ivan – ‘will in time be indexed to the price of electricity’

    Heat pumps are supposed to use less power than plug-in heaters but no exact cost is given.

  4. saighdear says:

    Heat pumps are supposed to use less power than plug-in heaters – of course they do, but when the temp gradient is out with the specification, then you only really get the Heat developed by the machinery. But what about the cost of the installation on top of the running ( & Maintenance costs – over 60 years? Heck the windmills only have a lifespan of 25 yrs and Councils already tear down buildings under 50 years old) Millennium Dome etc – is it still there?

  5. Graeme No.3 says:

    Perhaps they could heat the water with output from wind turbines? That removes the need to run gas turbines up and down, so more efficient use, less cost (per MWh) and less CO2 generation (per MWh).

  6. AC Osborn says:

    £9,000,000,the council contribution divided by 300 homes = £30,000 per home at £500/year for 60 years.
    This they claim is affordable?
    How many people who sign up for it will still be around in 60 years?
    If you include the £3,000,000 government grant it is £40,000 per home.
    Only in “net zero world” does this make sense.

  7. saighdear says:

    Shouldn’t it REALLY be “NOT zero world” – at least it would be t elling the truth. unlike https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/tipping-points-report-shows-humanity-on-disastrous-trajectory promoting more of this rubbish. Who’s useful idiot are they ( and even when I give them some credit for a story, they don’t like me! Ha! if only they new who I am !! Psh!

  8. Phoenix44 says:

    There’s some skullduggery here. A 60 year loan for equipment with what, a 20 year life? Assuming equal repayments means that after 20 years, with new equioment and a loan, the total loan will be 1.66x the size of the original. And 20 years after that it’s 2x the size. So the cost keeps getting larger.

  9. oldbrew says:

    Government report: Heat Pumps in District Heating (2016)
    For each of the scenarios modelled here, the price of heat is likely to be significantly higher for district heating schemes incorporating heat pumps.
    The cost increase for heat pump in district heating schemes is due largely to the high capital cost of the heat pumps.
    [bold added]

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/502500/DECC_Heat_Pumps_in_District_Heating_-_Final_report.pdf [page 129]

  10. saighdear says:

    “due largely to the high capital cost of the heat pumps.” I thought heatpumps cost the same wherever you were. surely it is the installation INFRASTRUTURE which costs more : Digging the trenches, laying insulated pipes, etc … Always this beating about the bush to do a simple job.
    Problem: House is cold. Solution: Supply £30 Heaters & Plug in. Wow! so simple.

  11. Ray Sanders says:

    “Yesterday” TV channel guide 2050….Abandoned Engineering – “The Strange Mystery of Swaffham Prior”

    [reply] 😎

  12. oldbrew says:

    Problem: House is cold. Solution: Supply £30 Heaters & Plug in.

    Still need hot water from somewhere?

  13. saighdear says:

    Is this it ?”Abandoned Engineering” Ghosts of the Swamp (TV Episode 2020)
    well no – but I just liked the idea of the SWAMP: but hay ho! Looks like they are trying to hide it ? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+Strange+Mystery+of+Swaffham+Prior+&t=opera&ia=web

  14. saighdear says:

    Duh ! water ? Here in Scotland, we try to keep that OUT of the house: we have thinghies which you can easily carry around and place wherever you want to sit it – like a good wee doggie. Plug it’s “tailie” into a suitable receptacle which we have ample of scattered around the walls. Socket to me baby! Voila switch on and you get heat. We even have ones with a lightbulb to pretend you have that glowing embers ( that’s a bigger doggie) and so on. you get the message 🙂

  15. oldbrew says:

    Hint – 2050 was the year not the time.

  16. Daedalus says:

    £12,000,000 divided by 300 houses = £40,000 per house. Well isn’t that good value then?
    This stuff really is total bo77ocks!

  17. Bob Webster says:

    Why address the costs of this insanity? It is literally insane to spend a single penny on “net zero” or any other “decarbonization” foolishness.

    The science is clear. Carbon dioxide is the “gas of life”… plants require it for their existence… we’re ALL made from carbon-based material!

    We could increase atmospheric CO2 by tenfold with no significant impact (other than a demonstrable “greening” of the planet)!

    No real “science” exists to support the insane “greenhouse gas climate change THEORY”!

    We should be focusing on the weakness of the foundation upon which such foolishness as “net zero” is built, not addressing its costs.

    If it came at no cost, it would still be foolish to pursue it because of “net zero”!

    Stop the insanity! Make politicians explain their anti-science proposals by asking them clear questions (that will expose their ignorance).

    And not the least important is a need to root out teaching fraud in the school systems across the globe where such nonsense as “greenhouse warming” theory is being taught. The whole “climate change” issue is laced with fraud and belief in hypotheses for which there is no consistent/persistent supporting evidence in nature.

  18. coecharlesdavid says:

    Well said.

  19. My Home Farm says:

    Before taking the plunge you should check out “Bodge Buster”, a book designed to guide homeowners through the complexities of air source heat pump installations. It addresses the increasing issue of inadequate installations in the UK’s air source heat pump sector. This concern is significant in the field of renewable heating, where a rise in poor installations has led to discontent and skepticism about the reliability of this technology.

    Amazon Print Edition: https://amzn.to/3NVndlU
    Amazon Kindle Ebook: https://amzn.to/3tIvPW1
    Apple Books: https://books.apple.com/gb/book/bodge-buster/id6475490660

Leave a comment