‘Very Bizarre’: Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data

Posted: March 4, 2024 by oldbrew in alarmism, climate, Critique, data, modelling, Natural Variation, Temperature
Tags: ,


“Climate activism has become the new religion of the 21st century – heretics are not welcome and not allowed to ask questions,” says astrophysicist Willie Soon. But data manipulation, or tampering, is rife. Most climate models over-predict warming, while natural variations continue.
– – –
Temperature records used by climate scientists and governments to build models that then forecast dangerous manmade global warming repercussions have serious problems and even corruption in the data, multiple scientists who have published recent studies on the issue told The Epoch Times. — Zerohedge reporting.

The Biden administration leans on its latest National Climate Assessment report as evidence that global warming is accelerating because of human activities. The document states that human emissions of “greenhouse gases” such as carbon dioxide are dangerously warming the Earth.

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) holds the same view, and its leaders are pushing major global policy changes in response.

But scientific experts from around the world in a variety of fields are pushing back.

In peer-reviewed studies, they cite a wide range of flaws with the global temperature data used to reach the dire conclusions; they say it’s time to reexamine the whole narrative.

Problems with temperature data include a lack of geographically and historically representative data, contamination of the records by heat from urban areas, and corruption of the data introduced by a process known as “homogenization.”

The flaws are so significant that they make the temperature data—and the models based on it—essentially useless or worse, three independent scientists with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES) explained.

The experts said that when data corruption is considered, the alleged “climate crisis” supposedly caused by human activities disappears.

Instead, natural climate variability offers a much better explanation for what is being observed, they said.

Some experts told The Epoch Times that deliberate fraud appeared to be at work, while others suggested more innocent explanations.

But regardless of why the problems exist, the implications of the findings are hard to overstate.

With no climate crisis, the justification for trillions of dollars in government spending and costly changes in public policy to restrict carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions collapses, the scientists explained in a series of interviews about their research.

Full report here.
– – –
Image: Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation 1880 to Nov 2018 based on the ERSSTv3b dataset [credit: Giorgiogp2, bender235 @ Wikipedia]

Comments
  1. Nelson Woodard says:

    isn’t the AMO you show detrended?

    [reply] see ERSST v3b info here — https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00833

  2. catweazle666 says:

    It doesn’t matter whether the data fed into computer games – er sorry – “Climate Models” is good, bad or indifferent.

    Anyone who claims that a purported computer game climate simulation of an effectively infinitely large open-ended non-linear feedback-driven (where we don’t know all the feedbacks, and even the ones we do know, we are unsure of the signs of some critical ones) chaotic system – hence subject to inter alia extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, strange attractors and bifurcation – is capable of making meaningful predictions over any significant time period is either a charlatan or a computer salesman.

  3. Graeme No.3 says:

    Cat:

    As we used to say Garbage in, Garbage out.

    Now it is Garbage in, Computer model out.

  4. darteck says:

    Graeme No.3 says: March 4, 2024 at 7:59 pm

    “Cat:

    As we used to say Garbage in, Garbage out.

    Now it is Garbage in, Computer model out.”

    I concur!

    Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat).

  5. stpaulchuck says:

    catweazle666 says: [March 4, 2024 at 2:11 pm]

    ————————–

    Here’s my favorite observations on that:

    “The influence of mankind on climate is trivially true and numerically insignificant.” – Dr Richard Lindzen

    [any of you have have read up on Chaos Theory will recognize this:] “The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” – IPCC TAR WG1, Working Group I: The Scientific Basis

    fraudulent temperature data in the climate assessment – https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=qVdcWHxPhIg

  6. Bob Webster says:

    Puts the proper perspective on the entire climate change narrative.

    Brilliant observation and so appropriate!

    Lindzen is the cream of the crop!

Leave a comment