Coal demand to remain stable amid climate concerns: IEA

Posted: December 17, 2019 by oldbrew in Energy
Tags: , ,

Credit: Coal India Limited


As the COP 25 summit ends in disarray, all attempts to stoke up fears of a man-made ‘climate crisis’ are not going well, in some parts of the world at least. Hard to see developing countries turning away from reliable and affordable energy any time soon.

The demand for coal will remain steady over the next four years due to demand from Asia, which comes despite fears of the climate crisis, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said Tuesday.

Coastal areas across Southeast Asia have already seen major floods and seawater incursion linked to climate change, claims Phys.org.

“Global coal demand has rebounded since 2017,” the IEA said in a report.

“Although it will probably decline in 2019, we expect it to remain broadly steady thereafter through 2024,” the Paris-based agency said.

Coal is the primary source of energy used to generate electricity and accounts for more than 40 percent of energy-related CO2 emissions. It is also widely used to produce steel and cement.

Europe and the United States are becoming less reliant on coal, but its use is increasing in Asia—especially in India and China which are the world’s largest coal producers and users.

“Coal-fired power plants in Asia are young—12 years old on average. So they could still run for decades,” said IEA executive director Fatih Birol.

He said it will be necessary to have access to technologies such as carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) projects—a costly technology which captures and stores CO2 to prevent it from being released into the atmosphere.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. hunterson7 says:

    Phys.org should change its name to “voodoo.org”. They are openly supporting anti-scientific nonsense.

  2. ivan says:

    Maybe the UN will learn that they can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but they can’t fool all of the people all of the time.

    They may also learn that failed predictions do not help their cause neither do totally uneconomic engineering ‘solutions’ to a non issue.

    People want cheap reliable power not unreliable unaffordable alternatives. Since they have a total aversion to nuclear power the only solution to supply reliable base load power is coal.

    The eco-freaks need to get over themselves and accept that CO2 is a necessary plant food and without it we would all be dead. Their continual gnashing of teeth over it just shows they, like any death cult, have a death wish.

  3. oldbrew says:

    From Northern Ireland…

    Net zero carbon emissions: Public’s help wanted for future policy
    By Conor Macauley
    BBC NI Agriculture & Environment Correspondent
    2 hours ago

    Getting big changes right on how we generate power, travel and heat our homes is of “fundamental importance” as NI attempts to meet a government target on zero carbon emissions.

    And there must be no repeat of the disastrous RHI scheme, according to a government document.

    It has asked for the public’s help in setting future policy.

    Submitted ideas will be brought to any incoming economy minister and will feed into future schemes.

    But in broad terms it will mean much less reliance on fossil fuels and much greater emphasis on renewables.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-50814941
    – – –
    NI doesn’t have a government since the main parties fell out a while ago, hence ‘any incoming economy minister’. So who put this out?

    December 13 2019
    Talks aimed at restoring the Stormont institutions are set to resume on Monday.
    . . .
    “We’ll be giving this everything between now and January to get the Assembly and Executive up and running.

    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-2019/general-election-focus-switches-to-northern-ireland-assembly-as-alliance-and-sdlp-celebrate-big-gains-38781912.html

  4. Stuart Brown says:

    Ever since the UK blackout back in August, we’ve been burning coal a lot too. And look at today, to cherry pick a bit, but it is today… Right now 4.1GW from coal and 5.6GW from nuclear. Wind and solar? 2.6 and 0.85GW. Useless, although the combined capacity of wind and solar nearly adds up to 35GW. All that money and it’s giving us less than 10% of the ‘capable of powering X homes’ figure.

    And what are we relying on? Gas, of course.

    (a couple of my recent comments vanished. If this one does, I give up. The world will continue to turn, I’m sure)

    [mod] sorry – checked spam bin not there

  5. Stuart Brown says:

    Mods – thanks for checking. One of life’s little mysteries and no big deal.

  6. JB says:

    @ hunterson7 You noticed too. Running out of places to garner decent science news.

  7. Coeur de Lion says:

    Silly letter in The Times today talking about more windmills offshore and the need to get other European countries online with inter connectors – I think that’s what it was about. Wrote to the editor saying much as above- wind at 4.5 %, coal double that, gas 55%, nuclear 13%. Lights will go out and we need a proper debate before decarbonisation wrecks us. It won’t get printed but keep trying.

  8. stpaulchuck says:

    ” despite fears of the climate crisis” More like fears of a cashflow crises among doom mongers as the public wises up.

    “Coastal areas across Southeast Asia have already seen major floods and seawater incursion linked to climate change,”

    A total load of codswallop. These azzclowns NEVER do any research, particularly if history blunts their sword. There’s hundreds of years of writing in Asia on weather patterns, in particular about typhoons (hurricanes on this side of the Pacific *grin*) and other major weather events. There is nothing new about ANY of today’s weather patterns.