Summary
The NASA Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Project has been providing state-of-the art satellite data on Earth’s reflected solar and emitted thermal radiation along with several cloud parameters for over 2.4 decades now. These observations are crucial for the quantification of global climate dynamics and proper evaluation of climate drivers. CERES data have shown that the Earth’s average annual absorption of solar energy increased by 2.0 W m-2 from 2000 to 2020 (and by 2.7 W m-2 between 2000 and 2023) due to a decrease in planetary albedo, which was mostly driven by a reduction of low-level clouds. For comparison, according to the IPCC AR6, the total anthropogenic forcing from 1750 to 2019 was 2.72 W m-2 (Forster et al. 2021, Section 7.3.5.2). Hence, the solar forcing measured over the past 2.4 decades has the same magnitude as the anthropogenic forcing estimated by models for the past 27 decades!
A close read of Chapter 7 in the Working Group I Contribution to the 2021 IPCC Report reveals that, not only was the measured albedo-controlled solar forcing ignored as a climate driver in the Report’s conclusions, but Section 7.2.2 in Chapter 7 contains Figure 7.3, which shows opposite trends of reflected solar and outgoing thermal flaxes to those observed by CERES. This article presents the results from our investigation of the IPCC’s Fig. 7.3.
After examining the IPCC data repository at GitHub.com and communicating with two lead authors of Chapter 7, we found that the CERES global anomalies of reflected shortwave and outgoing longwave radiation have been multiplied by -1 in the computer code employed to generate Fig. 7.3. This caused inversion of the long-term trends of these key climate parameters. Dr. Matthew Palmer, one of the authors of Section 7.2.2, admitted in an email message that this trend inversion was intentionally done, but failed to provide a convincing justification for it.
The results from the trend inversion of CERES radiation data in the IPCC AR6 are highly consequential. Thus, Fig. 7.3 creates a false impression that the solar forcing played no role in recent warming and the rising concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases caused a retention of heat in the climate system by impeding the outgoing LW radiation. The truth is that the solar forcing explains the entire tropospheric warming since 2000, and there is no sign of “heat trapping” by greenhouse gases. Had the IPCC acknowledged the increase of Earth’s sunlight absorption in the 21st Century, this would have invalidated the Report’s central assertion that human carbon emissions were the main driver of climate in recent decades. In conclusion, it appears that radiative flux anomalies in Fig. 7.3 were manipulated and a discussion about long-term CERES trends in Section 7.2.2 was intentionally omitted, because the actual observations present a significant empirical challenge to the UN’s political Agenda set by Resolution A/RES/43/53 in 1988 to promote Anthropogenic Climate Change.
1. Introduction
The 6th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR6) concluded “It is very likely that well-mixed GHGs [greenhouse gases] were the main driver of tropospheric warming since 1979” (IPCC, 2021; p.5). This statement implies that all known climate forcings have properly been evaluated using the available data, and GHGs have been found to exert a disproportionally large radiative effect on the Global Surface Air Temperature (GSAT) over the past 45 years. However, a close examination of Chapter 7 of the Working Group I (WG1) Contribution to the IPCC AR6 (Forster et al. 2021), which discusses the Earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks and climate sensitivity, reveals that the observed decrease of Earth’s albedo and the corresponding increase of absorbed shortwave radiation by the Planet for the past 20 years have not been taken into account as contributors to the recent warming. Section 7.2.2 of Chapter 7 entitled “Changes in Earth’s Energy Budget” acknowledges that there have been multidecadal periods of significant decreasing and increasing trends in surface solar radiation (SSR) called “global dimming” (i.e. from 1950s to 1980s) and “global brightening” (after 1980s), respectively. The report states: “There is high confidence that these [SSR] trends are widespread, and not localized phenomena or measurement artefacts.” Indeed, the existence of such dimming and brightening multi-decadal periods has been acknowledged by science for more than 10 years (Stanhill et al. 2014; Yuan et al. 2021), but the IPCC AR6 provides no global estimate of the observed positive trend in SSR since 1980s and its impact on GSAT. Instead, the Report simply states “The origin of these trends is not fully understood”.
With respect to the top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) solar fluxes, Section 7.2.2 of the IPCC AR WG1 offers no analysis of the substantial decrease in Earth’s shortwave reflectance since 2000 observed by the NASA Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project (Loeb et al. 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021) and also reported by other research teams (e.g. Dübal & Vahrenholt 2021; Stephens et al. 2022). The Report does not discuss the observed 2.0 W m-2 increase in solar-energy uptake by the Planet from 2000 to 2020 nor its contribution to the recent warming. What is even more puzzling, Subsection 7.2.2.1 of the IPCC AR6 WG1 Contribution features graphs in their Fig. 7.3 (on p. 936) showing an increasing reflected solar flux and decreasing outgoing thermal flux since 2000 that are supposedly based on CERES data. However, these trends are opposite of what CERES has actually measured and directly contradict results reported by prior studies. This article presents findings from our investigation of Fig. 7.3 in the IPCC AR6.
Read the rest of this entry »






















