Cheeky Pukitee: nicking knowledge without acknowledgement

Last week I told Paul Pukite where he was going wrong with his ENSO model:

@WHUT @LittleIceAge You still don't have the prime mover for your oscillation, no matter how you attempt to derail the convo to hide that.

— Rog Tallbloke (Righto/Chief) 🇬🇧 (@RogTallbloke) September 3, 2015

@WHUT @LittleIceAge And what do you think the prime movers behind tides and the CW are? 😉
QBO is a long way up in the sky, & of tiny mass

— Rog Tallbloke (Righto/Chief) 🇬🇧 (@RogTallbloke) September 3, 2015

@WHUT @LittleIceAge I did that ages ago. Look: https://t.co/dSw9I1YGmm Tides not mentioned in your abstract by the way…

— Rog Tallbloke (Righto/Chief) 🇬🇧 (@RogTallbloke) September 3, 2015

This week, he’s ‘discovered’ that The Moon and the tides it raises underlie both The El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and  the Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO), which he previously thought was the driver of ENSO along with the Chandler Wobble (CW), as seen in the tweets above. He hastily added ‘tides’ though they get no mention in his original post.