Wind subsidy harvesting industry’s reputation up in smoke: 10 times more fires than reported

Posted: July 17, 2014 by tallbloke in atmosphere, Carbon cycle, Clouds, flames, Robber Barons, wind

turbine-failH/T to Glenties WiG for this Yachting Monthly report:

Wind turbine blaze scandal

Up to 120 wind turbines catch fire annually, according to the journal of Fire Safety Science. This is 10 times the number reported by the industry, The figures, compiled by engineers at Imperial College London and the University of Edinburgh, make fire the second-largest cause of accidents after blade failure.

The researchers claim that out of 200,000 turbines around the world, 117 fires take place annually, many more than the 12 reported by wind farm companies.


Each wind turbine costs more than £2 million and generates an estimated income of more than £500,000 per year.Any loss or downtime of these valuable assets makes the industry less viable and productive.

Dr Guillermo Rein of Imperial’s department of mechanical engineering, said: ‘Fires are a problem for the industry, impacting on energy production, economic output and emitting toxic fumes.

Read more

Comments
  1. oldbrew says:

    If wind turbines were planes they would all be grounded.

  2. tallbloke says:

    OB: If wind turbines were planes they would all be grounded.

    Intentionally or not.

  3. Curious George says:

    According to the original article, one wind turbine catches fire in 1,000 years, not in 10,000 years as reported. Don’t waste time on that.

  4. hunter says:

    TB,
    Did you come up with that fantastic description of the windmill industry?

  5. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    TO BAD IT ISN’T MORE FOR THIS JOKE OF POWER GENERATION.

  6. tallbloke says:

    Hunter: Yes. 🙂

  7. This is still a low failure rate, surely?
    I did find some research on reliability of wind farms last year, but the PDF is now not downloadable (http://www.researchgate.net/publication/205337678_Reliability_of_Wind_Turbines/file/3deec517c0f7157a68.pdf).
    It stated: “…an average wind turbine (WT) will be inactive for around one week per year for repairs and maintenance.”. I made a post with a pie chart from the PDF on the breakdown causes: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115039112804619781585/posts/XdxFRNQkwrX

  8. tallbloke says:

    Colin: If it’s a low failure rate, why isn’t the industry saying so, rather than hiding 9/10ths of it?

    Given that a number of the failures happen when brakes fail in strong winds, and the proximity of many turbines to dry summer forests, there’s no room for complacency here whatsoever.

  9. hunter says:

    The windmill industry has no incentive to make honest reports. The fire hazard TB refers to is a real issue.
    Additionally, if windmills were so dependable, then grid managers would not rate the power output of windmills at small fractions of their rated capacity.
    I don’t doubt Colin’s sincerity. I doubt the sincerity of the data he has been given.

  10. hunter says:

    Colin,
    Your website is great.
    That bit from Carl Sagan is so worth re-reading.
    http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2014/01/03/baloney-detection-kit-carl-sagan/
    And the Apollo 11 documentary was bittersweet.
    We really did achieve so much. And the takers have reduced us so far.

  11. tallbloke: I agree. Subsidised industries should make data such as this public.
    I expect most fires are averted due to the sensors picking up mechanical failures/temp rises before combustion. Questions to ask: what are the causes of the fires, gusts of wind=>mechanical failure?
    hunter: thanks!

  12. Sera says:

    So- how long until the BBC demands that ‘Yachting Monthly’ not talk to skeptics?

  13. Brian H says:

    Won’t have any impact on Funders or Believers. After all, what’s a decimal point between friends?

  14. Stephen Richards says:

    That’s £200,000,000,000 wasted on wind turbine AND more to come.

  15. Stephen Richards says:

    tallbloke says:

    July 18, 2014 at 9:36 am

    Colin: If it’s a low failure rate, why isn’t the industry saying so, rather than hiding 9/10ths of it?

    Given that a number of the failures happen when brakes fail in strong winds, and the proximity of many turbines to dry summer forests, there’s no room for complacency here whatsoever.

    This point is very important. In france they are erecting many turbines in forests. Normally, it is obligatoire to cut the trees down within a 500m radius and replant elsewhere. This requirement has been waved by the socialists. Our forests are very dry in summer. We are not allowed to light a fire at any time of year within 200m (Bar B Ques included) of a forest and a flame fire at all. The rest of the year, fires are forbidden in the months of june, july, august, september and restricted fire only in march, april, may. Turbines can ignite any time they like.

  16. Have a look at the researcher’s own blog: http://guillermo-rein.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/wind-turbines-on-fire.html
    “Sources of information are incomplete, biased, or contain non-publically available data. The poor statistical records of wind turbine fires are a main cause of concern and hinder any research effort in this field…
    The main causes of fire ignition in wind turbines are (in decreasing order of importance): lighting strike, electrical malfunction, mechanical malfunction, and maintenance.”

  17. glenncz says:

    >: If it’s a low failure rate, why isn’t the industry saying so, rather than hiding 9/10ths of it?

    Because [mod: snip] about everything comes so natural for the wind industry, they just can’t help themselves. .

    [mod: keep inside the acceptable limit please, spin or whatever –Tim]

  18. hunter says:

    Sara, you asked when will the BBC demand Yachting magazine stop talking to skeptics?
    The answer of course is when Grantham’s attack dog tells the BBC to do it.

  19. cornwallwindwatch says:

    Reblogged this on Cornwall Wind Watch.

  20. A C Osborn says:

    Don’t forget this is only Catching fire, there are gearbox failures, blade failures and structural failures on top of that.

  21. Richard111 says:

    A bit O/T, given the interesting weather the UK has been experiencing and all the houses being set on fire by lightning I think it strange that there seems to be a total lack of damage to wind turbines by all this lightning. Are they that good at conducting lightning into their huge steel reinforced bases?

  22. oldbrew says:

    Daily Express quotes RenewablesUK : “State of the art monitoring systems ensure that the vast majority of turbine fires can be dealt with quickly and effectively.”

    ‘Vast majority’ – sounds like there are a lot of incidents?

  23. tallbloke says:

    Only 117 worldwide last year (we now know of).

    “Dealt with quickly”.
    I haven’t spotted the fire engine sheds at all rural windfarms. They must be in underground bunkers.