Rosema et al: Global cooling of Earth’s surface since 1982

Posted: August 3, 2013 by tallbloke in Analysis, climate, Dataset, Measurement, methodology, Natural Variation

A very interesting paper published in Energy and Environment has found that the Earth’s actual surface (as opposed to the air temperature 1.5-2m above it) has been cooling since at least 1982, according to data from the European METEOSAT satellite observation platform, which is in a geostationary orbit above the equator on the Greenwich Meridian. The authors think this is due to increased cloudiness. They point out that the UAH satellite data processed by John Christy also showed a cooling of the troposphere in the 1980’s until ‘adjustments’ were applied to the original computations. It’s a very readable paper, reprinted from the E&E Journal, available here.

cooling

INTRODUCTION
EARS Earth Environment Monitoring is providing Meteosat based water and climate
services. To this end, Meteosat visual and thermal infrared images are received hourly
and processed to hemispheric data fields of surface and boundary layer temperature,
global and net radiation, actual and potential evapotranspiration, as well as
precipitation. These data are then applied in drought monitoring, crop yield forecasting
[1,2] and river flow forecasting systems. Since 2009, EARS is also developing drought
and excessive precipitation insurance [3]. For this purpose a 30 year data base of
hourly Meteosat visual (VIS) and thermal infrared (TIR) images has been composed.
In this study we have used these data to study recent change in planetary temperature.
The subject is topical as during the past decades the fear has developed that by the
burning of fossil fuels and the resulting increase in atmospheric CO2 content, mankind
is seriously affecting climate beyond its natural variability and to an extent that will
appear to be detrimental to plant, animal and human live. This fear has been driven by
time series of temperature measurements at meteorological stations, which show an
overall temperature increase of 0.074 K/decade during the last 100 year, increasing to
0.177 K/decade when considering the last 30 year [4]. These air temperature
measurements are taken at 1.5-2 meter height, in an environment that during the past
century has progressively undergone changes in surface conditions due to
urbanization, road building and drainage. In the Netherlands, for example 10 percent
of the national area currently consists of hardened surface. Such changes may have a
significant effect on local air temperatures. Therefore there is a need to supplement
these near surface local air temperature observations with large scale temperature
observations from satellites.

The calibration of satellite data has long been a thorny issue, and the authors utilise an interesting and to me reasonably plausible method to verify the satellite observations. Two small areas show a warming trend. One is located in S.E. Iraq, where Saddam Hussain took his revenge on the Shiite marsh arabs by draining their homeland between the Tigris and euphrates in the following the first gulf war. The consequent drying of the area has led to a ~10C increase in surface temperature, according to their satellite data. They show that from theory, a very similar magnitude is calculated.

Clearly this is a startling result, and some thought needs to be put into the opposite sign of trend found by this study when compared with other datasets and time series. One thought might be that increased cloudiness would perhaps lead to higher noon and night humidity near the surface which would lift the near surface air temperature measured by the surface stations used by organisations such as the MET Office and NOAA. Another possibility is that the mostly positive adjustments which have applied to near surface air temperature data worldwide might be wrong. .

Comments
  1. Brian H says:

    Arghh! Unspecified, unjustified and unflagged “adjustments” to public data bases should be harshly punished.

    IAC, of course returning CO2 to the atmosphere and bumping levels above the borderline famine levels plants naturally drive it down to is nothing but beneficial. It’s probably what Gaia put us here to do.

    [Reply] George Carlin:
    Mankind: “Why are we here”
    God: “Plastic….. Assholes.”

    Still makes me laugh.

  2. […] Click here to read the full article _____________________________________________ […]

  3. tallbloke says:

    I’m amazed this article didn’t attract more interest. What is going on here? Is the EUMETSAT wonky? Or has the actual surface itself cooled because warming has increased precipitation and evaporation, which would cool the surface but warm the near surface air?

    If so the implications are profound. It would mean the surface isn’t absorbing and retaining as much energy as the modelers think. Which would mean the tilting of the ARGO data by ‘adjustments’ is unjustified. That would invalidate the ‘heat hiding in the deep ocean’ ad hockery used to save the AGW theory wouldn’t it?

  4. Rosema et al failed to account for the many factors besides temperature which could impact the signal they’re looking at. It’s “not even wrong”.

    Besides, finding a huge cooling trend over the time period (past 30 years) where every relevant measures points to warming should be a red flag if ever there was one.

    See also this (Dutch – perhaps google translate can assist) guest blog: http://klimaatverandering.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/rare-oprisping-aarde-is-sinds-1982-afgekoeld-o-ja/

  5. tallbloke says:

    Hi Bart,

    If warming of the ocean increases evaporation and precipitation, then we would expect to find more water in the surface soils. That evaporates and cools the surface of the Earth. However, that evaporate increases the near surface humidity and water vapour, as has been observed. Because water vapour directly absorbs incoming solar radiation at the IR end of the spectrum, this causes a warming of the near surface air, and prevents some of the IR reaching the surface. The 80′ and 90’s saw reduced cloud and increased sunshine hours, exacerbating the effect.

    So in fact, their observations are consistent with the data. Warming near surface air (a truly irrelevant measure of ‘global warming’, used by ‘professional’ climatologists as the ‘gold standard’ for climatology), and cooling of the surface due to increased moisture content, confirmed by observations from satellite data.

    It’s about time intelligent people like yourself stopped rejecting adverse data out of hand and started thinking a bit harder.

  6. Brian H says:

    Carlin was above all a sarcastic misanthropist. His “surviving Earth, which will do just fine” without humans is the preferred outcome, as far as he is concerned. The emphasis is on “without”.