Study outlines five thermal energy grand challenges for decarbonization

Posted: August 13, 2020 by oldbrew in Emissions, Energy, ideology
Tags: ,

Green dreamland


Only five ‘grand’ challenges? Better be quick — we keep hearing there’s supposed to be a climate emergency on. Yes, throw out existing successful energy solutions when there’s nothing of equivalence to replace them with. Then wonder what to do next, while muttering about climate change. Great plan! Or maybe not.
– – –
Solar and wind power are an important part of solving the problem of climate change, but these renewable technologies on their own probably will never provide the energy for many industrial processes, like making steel, reports TechXplore.

Approximately 90 percent of the world’s energy use involves generation or manipulation of heat, including the cooling of buildings and food.

Maintaining modern economies and improving life in developing economies while mitigating climate change will require five major advances in how we convert, store and transmit thermal energy, according to a new paper in Nature Energy from Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

“Modern renewable technologies are the most inexpensive source of electricity we have today, but solar and wind power are intermittent and account for a small percentage of the world’s energy,” said Arun Majumdar, one of three co-authors and a Stanford professor of mechanical engineering. “We need to increase this percentage, but we also must decarbonize heat and use heat to store electricity from solar and wind.”

The analysis underscores the urgent need to research and develop thermal technology breakthroughs that potentially could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least one gigaton, which is about 3 percent of annual energy-related GHG emissions globally.

“We as a species are endangering ourselves with the infrastructure we have erected to improve our quality of life,” said co-author Asegun Henry, associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. “There are a few instances in history when scientists and engineers have come together and achieved something very remarkable in very short timeframes. This must be one of those times.”

Heat as energy storage

One major challenge in thermal engineering is to store excess wind and solar power as heat energy over multiple days and then convert it back into electricity when needed.

The full decarbonization of electricity would reduce man-made, global GHG emissions by about a fourth. Getting 70 percent or more of our electricity from intermittent renewables will require massive additions of electricity storage.

Expanding the most common current technology, pumped hydroelectric storage, is limited by geography, and lithium-ion batteries are too expensive for storing excess renewable power over multiple days.

“The key advantage for thermal energy storage is its potential for low cost at large scale,” said co-author Ravi Prasher, associate laboratory director for energy technologies at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

“While it is relatively easy to convert electricity to heat,” Prasher explained, “the key challenge for thermal energy storage is the large efficiency penalty when converting heat back to electricity.”

Full report here.

Comments
  1. […] via Study outlines five thermal energy grand challenges for decarbonization […]

  2. ivan says:

    Ah, more ‘pie in the sky’ thinking. Those clowns were pushing the heat storage idea a few years ago, they got no traction then and I doubt they will now. As for using the ‘reduction in carbon’ argument that is total cods-wallop, in fact we need more CO2 in the atmosphere to help with the greening of the planet.

    There is a mistake in their statement Modern renewable technologies are the most inexpensive source of electricity we have today, if they believe that I have a few bridges to sell them – instead of renewables being the most inexpensive, they are, in fact, the most expensive form of electricity generation known to man. They have a short life cycle, produce a massive amount of toxic waste both in manufacture and disposal and kill the wildlife in their area – something that is never talked about in academic circles.

    Contrast with a well designed coal fired power station. It gives rated output 24/7, is viable for more than 50 years, leaves no toxic waste – the ash can go to make bricks, road surfaces and other useful items.

  3. oldbrew says:

    “While it is relatively easy to convert electricity to heat,” Prasher explained, “the key challenge for thermal energy storage is the large efficiency penalty when converting heat back to electricity.”
    – – –
    Knowing the problem is a start, but no more.

  4. oldbrew says:

    From an article promoting molten salt energy storage, discussing various alternatives:

    ‘The last type of energy storage is thermal, which is low quality in the sense that there are fundamental thermodynamic costs in converting thermal energy to electrical energy.’

    http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph240/dodaro2/

  5. Gamecock says:

    “Modern renewable technologies are the most inexpensive source of electricity we have today”

    Full stop on my reading.

  6. Gamecock says:

    /trump-recovers-taxpayer-cash-on-a-1-billion-obama-backed-solar-plant-that-was-obsolete-before-ever-going-online/

    Recovers? That’s silly. They got a judgement against a bankrupt company. So people with no money owe us money now. We’ll get nothing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s