Germany’s global hydrogen plans could accelerate climate change, UK government study suggests

Posted: April 15, 2022 by oldbrew in atmosphere, Emissions, Energy, government, hydrogen, ideology
Tags: , ,

German hydrogen train [image credit: Euractiv]


The issue is leakage. In any case the notion of part of the supposed cure for ‘climate change’ being worse than the supposed disease is ironic. Germany imagines a future of so-called climate neutrality, a concept lacking any real-world meaning.
– – –
German Economy Minister Robert Habeck plans to import hydrogen from all over the world to satisfy Germany’s hunger for energy despite a new study questioning the climate-friendliness of hydrogen transport, EURACTIV Germany reports.

One thing is clear to all politicians and experts: Germany is an energy importing country.

To move towards climate neutrality, the German government wants to rely primarily on importing hydrogen molecules from all over the world – efforts which have been further accelerated due to the war in Ukraine and Germany’s dependence on Russian energy imports.

The idea is to split water with the help of renewable electricity, then ship the hydrogen to Germany and use it as a raw material and energy source for German industry. For this, Habeck most recently announced a hydrogen partnership with the United Arab Emirates.

The establishment of global “hydrogen supply chains” would serve the “achievement of our climate goals and at the same time our energy security”, Habeck said on 21 March.

The “Berlin Energy Transition Dialogue” at the Foreign Office at the start of April also focused on the global hydrogen economy. Representatives of governments from around the world agreed to initial contracts with each other as well as with German representatives to supply hydrogen.

The global hydrogen trade is supported by the German government foundation H2Global, which will underpin the trade in the gas with €900 million from the national treasury.

Doubts about decarbonisation

Whether hydrogen, which is supposed to decarbonise industrial processes as well as shipping and aviation, will deliver what it promises, however, is now in doubt.

This is because hydrogen could be a lot more harmful to the climate than initially believed, especially if it were to escape and enter the atmosphere before being used.

“We estimate the hydrogen GWP(100) to be 11 ± 5; a value more than 100% higher than previously published calculations,” the UK government study, commissioned by the UK’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, writes.

The GWP, or global warming potential, measures the relative contribution that various chemical compounds make to the greenhouse gas effect. Based on CO2, the GWP shows how much worse gases like methane or the now banned chlorofluorocarbons are for the climate.

This would mean that hydrogen is at best six times worse for the climate than CO2 over a period of 100 years. In the worst-case scenario, hydrogen could even prove 16 times more harmful than the widespread greenhouse gas.

Accelerating climate change

According to the study, hydrogen would also contribute significantly to climate change, even within a 20-year time frame.
. . .
When hydrogen is transported in liquid form by tankers, more than 13% of the cargo could be lost along the way, writes Recharge News, referring to another study by the British ministry.

Full article here.
– – –

Comments
  1. […] Germany’s global hydrogen plans could accelerate climate change, UK government study sugg… […]

  2. JB says:

    “greenhouse gas effect” a phenomenon that resides in the craniums of politicians, indicative of corrosion.

    “more than 13% of the cargo could be lost along the way”
    And that’s not counting the fuel expended for transporting.

    Politicians dressed in lab coats, studying Nature, posing as competent engineers…

  3. oldbrew says:

    Germany’s energy options not looking good these days, with its nuclear sector about to close down…

    Energy Crisis: ‘Sharp Recession’ Looms if Germany Cut Off from Russian Gas

    Elected EU representatives last week demanded an “immediate” embargo be implemented against Russian coal, oil, nuclear energy and gas.

    Despite a resolution calling for such a ban being passed in Europe’s parliament, no such measure has materialised, with only a limited future ban on Russian coal being pencilled in by the political bloc.

    For gas in particular, this failure is most likely due to an extreme Europe-wide overreliance on Russian gas, with Germany, in particular, being heavily dependent on receiving such energy supplies from Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

    This has long been thought of as a potential security risk for both Europe and NATO, with Former US President Donald Trump slamming the Federal Republic for doing nothing to ween itself off the supply during his time in office.

    However, like many of the President’s warnings, his calls fell on deaf ears, leaving Germany to scramble towards alternative energy sources — such as expensive Liquified Natural Gas and Renewables — in the hopes of staying afloat now.

    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/04/14/energy-crisis-sharp-recession-looms-if-germany-cut-off-from-russian-gas/

  4. Gamecock says:

    Politicians jumped on the climate change bandwagon as they saw it as the grand Unifying Cause, the way to get people to accept global government.

    ‘Representatives of governments from around the world agreed to initial contracts with each other as well as with German representatives to supply hydrogen.’

  5. oldbrew says:

    APR 13, 2022
    Germany’s ‘Renewable Energy’ Policy: Who’s Laughing Now?

    “The ability to cheaply generate, transport and store a clean replacement fuel like hydrogen to power trucks, cars and airplanes remains years away…”

    https://climatechangedispatch.com/germanys-renewable-energy-policy-whos-laughing-now/

  6. pochas94 says:

    I can see a hydrogen future, but not with government pushing it.

  7. Gamecock says:

    Hydrogen has no chance in the market place for at least a century. It’s expensive and provides no advantage. If forced on markets, business will just go elsewhere.

  8. Scott says:

    It’s very clear to me that irony needs to be banned right alongside fossil fuels.

  9. Phoenix44 says:

    I am growing increasingly confident that the efforts to reduce emissions will almost all increase emissions over any reasonable timescale (say 25 years).

    If CO2 is a problem, we are making that problem worse, not better and creating new problems in doing so. Utterly unsurprising given the way this is being done.

  10. gbaikie says:

    “The issue is leakage. In any case the notion of part of the supposed cure for ‘climate change’ being worse than the supposed disease is ironic. ”

    Sure, and related:
    “Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) also known as hydrogen assisted cracking or hydrogen-induced cracking, describes the embrittlement of a metal by hydrogen. The essential facts about the nature of the hydrogen embrittlement of steels have now been known for 140 years.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_embrittlement

  11. oldbrew says:

    Giving up pointless climate posing and getting real…

    Germany To Drill For Gas In North Sea To Reduce Reliance On Russia
    Apr 20, 2022

    https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Germany-To-Drill-For-Gas-In-North-Sea-To-Reduce-Reliance-On-Russia.html

  12. […] costs and the leakage losses from shipping. Only last month the same source reported a study saying Germany’s global hydrogen plans could accelerate climate change. The study said ‘In the worst-case scenario, hydrogen could even prove 16 times more harmful […]

  13. […] and the leakage losses from shipping. Only last month the same source reported a study saying Germany’s global hydrogen plans could accelerate climate change. The study said ‘In the worst-case scenario, hydrogen could even prove 16 times more harmful than […]